- #SHOULD KEN BUROWS REALLY BE COO OF OCKHAM TECHNOLOGIES PRO#
- #SHOULD KEN BUROWS REALLY BE COO OF OCKHAM TECHNOLOGIES SOFTWARE#
- #SHOULD KEN BUROWS REALLY BE COO OF OCKHAM TECHNOLOGIES PROFESSIONAL#
In 1987, Ansoff suggested a Product / Market expansion 2 by 2 grid.
#SHOULD KEN BUROWS REALLY BE COO OF OCKHAM TECHNOLOGIES SOFTWARE#
Uncertainty lingers over each member's future contributions, though-how is the team to devise a durable and effective split? Jim Triandiflou and Ken Burows worked resolutely to plan for the launch of their sales management software company.Introduction to Ansoff Product Market Grid / Ansoff Matrix
#SHOULD KEN BUROWS REALLY BE COO OF OCKHAM TECHNOLOGIES PRO#
But as Ockham entered its initial phase of product development, pressure began mounting for the team to discuss and finalize a founding agreement.EMBA Pro Porter Five Forces Solution for Slicing Pie with a Razor: Ockham Technologies' Founding Agreement case study Ockham Technologies' three founders are about to craft their founding agreement and split the equity among themselves. Uncertainty lingers over each member's future contributions, though - how is the team to devise a durable and effective split? Jim Triandiflou and Ken Burows worked resolutely to plan for the launch of their sales management software company. Soon they recruited a third member, Mike Meisenheimer, to lead product development. Each founder had contributed significantly to bringing the Ockham concept to life. The trio had provided the seed capital of $150,000, contracted a development team to build their product, garnered serious interest from a potential investor, and readily agreed on their roles within the company (Jim was CEO, Ken was COO, and Mike was Head of Product Management).
What should they include in the agreement, and how should they structure their equity split?Ĭase Authors : Noam Wasserman, Yael Braid But as Ockham entered its initial phase of product development, pressure began mounting for the team to discuss and finalize a founding agreement.
#SHOULD KEN BUROWS REALLY BE COO OF OCKHAM TECHNOLOGIES PROFESSIONAL#
Related Areas : Collaboration, Conflict, Disruptive innovation, Diversity, Labor, Leading teams, Operations management, Product development, TechnologyĮMBA Pro Porter Five Forces Analysis Approach for Slicing Pie with a Razor: Ockham Technologies' Founding AgreementĪt EMBA PRO, we provide corporate level professional Marketing Mix and Marketing Strategy solutions. Slicing Pie with a Razor: Ockham Technologies' Founding Agreement case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Noam Wasserman, Yael Braid. The Slicing Pie with a Razor: Ockham Technologies' Founding Agreement (referred as “Ockham Split” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Marketing Mix, Product, Price, Place, Promotion, 4P, Collaboration, Conflict, Disruptive innovation, Diversity, Labor, Leading teams, Operations management, Product development, Technology. Our immersive learning methodology from – case study discussions to simulations tools help MBA and EMBA professionals to - gain new insight, deepen their knowledge of the Innovation & Entrepreneurship field, company, context, collaborators, competitors, customers, Marketing Mix factors, Products related decisions, pricing strategies and more.įirst published in 1979, “How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy” by Michael E. Porter, revolutionized the field of strategy. Popularly known as “Porter’s Five Forces” - not only influenced a generation of academic research but also provided a map to rigorously analyze the competitive forces. Porter Five Forces that Determine Industry Structure Porter Five Forces model is heavily borrowed from the traditional field of micro economics. The five forces that determine the industry structure of organization in casename case study are -ġ. Threat of substitute products and services - If the threat of substitute is high then Ockham Split has to either continuously invest into R&D or it risks losing out to disruptors in the industry.Ģ.
0 kommentar(er)
